Tuesday, March 24, 2020
Marxism Essays (2036 words) - Economic Ideologies, Anti-capitalism
  Marxism    I.  Introduction  II. Marxism        A. Definition & Explanation      B. Example: Economic Evolution       III. Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT)      A. Definition & Explanation      B. Example: The Parliament versus the Crown                   IV. Institutional Theory      A. Definition & Explanation      B. Example: Social Change  V.  Conclusion               Human relationships have always been dynamic. Change and   adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passage of time for human   society.  Systems have been developed to regulate, direct and control   the resources of this society. The systems are referred to as   governments and the resources as the populace or inhabitants and forces   of production. A government must be dynamic in its nature reflecting the   change in society.  At times these systems have resisted the necessity   to adapt with its components (Society) creating a deficit between the   system and those it regulates. As the deficits develop, they cause   instability, and could lead to revolution.1      Theories have been developed to explain the systemic phenomenon   called revolution. This paper will discuss three modern theories and   apply them to the English revolution of 1640. The first theory,   developed by Carl Marx (Marxism), will address the economic evolution in   English society. This theory will emphasize and explain how the shift   from a feudal/mercantile system to capitalism affected English society.    The second, called the Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) developed by   Charles Tilly, will explain how the English organizations (the Crown and   the Parliament) effectively obtained, amassed and managed resources.   Samuel Huntington's, "Institutional Theory", will argue that the   existing government at that time was unable to incorporate the demands   and personnel that the socio-economic changes created.      Marxism was formulated in the 19th century. Carl Marx and his   associate Frederick Engels observed the socio-economic changes that were   transpiring in Britain. England was the dominant world power and had   the largest industrialized economy during the 1800's. The development   of the factory and the institution of the assembly line created a large   demand for workers. This demand was satiated by migrating peasant from   the rural areas in England and Ireland to developing urban centers. As   these urban centers or cities evolved using industry as the economic   backbone for the population, a large number of factory workers were   accumulated to operate the machinery in horrid conditions. These   workers, which would be termed as the peasantry under a feudal system,   were now the working class or proletariat. They entered cities with   hopes of bettering their lives and survival. Though revolution never   took place in England during this period, it allowed Marx to study   industrialization, urbanization and imperialism.       The theory of Marxism has three basic concepts: historic   materialism, forces of production and relations of production. Historic   materialism is defined as a society's past performance and present   capabilities of satisfying the basic means of life. Humankind's basic   needs of eating, drinking and shelter need to be met properly. The   forces of production (technology, capital, the infrastructure of   society, etc.) are important for the simple fact of who ever controls   them controls the society. The last aspect of Marxism, the relations of   production, deals directly with the relationships between classes of   people (the aristocracy, the middle-class and the working class).2       Marxism includes a predictive analysis of socio-economic   structures. Using history, logic and the dynamic nature of humankind as   guidelines, Carl Marx attempts to map out a sequence of events which   will eventually lead to utopia (anarchy). In his work, Das Capital,   Marx details the six steps. These steps are primitive socialism,   feudalism, capitalism, socialism, communism and then anarchy.       The evolution of the English economic system during the 16th and   17th centuries points to a shift from feudalism to capitalism. This   shift is exemplified by the enclosures. The landlords began to fence   their property in the common land areas. The "commons" were large plots   of grazing and farmable lands that were used by both farmers and   artisans. When the land-owners and manorial lords began to partition   these lands the concept of private ownership of property was introduced   to the socio-economic system.3      During the time period of the 16th and 17th centuries the   crown's economic base began a gradual decline. This economic shrinkage   came to a spearhead during the reign of Charles I. The monarchy favored   a monopoly market system over a competitive one. The purpose for this  Marxism Essays (2036 words) - Economic Ideologies, Anti-capitalism    Marxism    I.  Introduction  II. Marxism        A. Definition & Explanation      B. Example: Economic Evolution       III. Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT)      A. Definition & Explanation      B. Example: The Parliament versus the Crown                   IV. Institutional Theory      A. Definition & Explanation      B. Example: Social Change  V.  Conclusion               Human relationships have always been dynamic. Change and   adaptability have gone hand in hand with the passage of time for human   society.  Systems have been developed to regulate, direct and control   the resources of this society. The systems are referred to as   governments and the resources as the populace or inhabitants and forces   of production. A government must be dynamic in its nature reflecting the   change in society.  At times these systems have resisted the necessity   to adapt with its components (Society) creating a deficit between the   system and those it regulates. As the deficits develop, they cause   instability, and could lead to revolution.1      Theories have been developed to explain the systemic phenomenon   called revolution. This paper will discuss three modern theories and   apply them to the English revolution of 1640. The first theory,   developed by Carl Marx (Marxism), will address the economic evolution in   English society. This theory will emphasize and explain how the shift   from a feudal/mercantile system to capitalism affected English society.    The second, called the Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) developed by   Charles Tilly, will explain how the English organizations (the Crown and   the Parliament) effectively obtained, amassed and managed resources.   Samuel Huntington's, "Institutional Theory", will argue that the   existing government at that time was unable to incorporate the demands   and personnel that the socio-economic changes created.      Marxism was formulated in the 19th century. Carl Marx and his   associate Frederick Engels observed the socio-economic changes that were   transpiring in Britain. England was the dominant world power and had   the largest industrialized economy during the 1800's. The development   of the factory and the institution of the assembly line created a large   demand for workers. This demand was satiated by migrating peasant from   the rural areas in England and Ireland to developing urban centers. As   these urban centers or cities evolved using industry as the economic   backbone for the population, a large number of factory workers were   accumulated to operate the machinery in horrid conditions. These   workers, which would be termed as the peasantry under a feudal system,   were now the working class or proletariat. They entered cities with   hopes of bettering their lives and survival. Though revolution never   took place in England during this period, it allowed Marx to study   industrialization, urbanization and imperialism.       The theory of Marxism has three basic concepts: historic   materialism, forces of production and relations of production. Historic   materialism is defined as a society's past performance and present   capabilities of satisfying the basic means of life. Humankind's basic   needs of eating, drinking and shelter need to be met properly. The   forces of production (technology, capital, the infrastructure of   society, etc.) are important for the simple fact of who ever controls   them controls the society. The last aspect of Marxism, the relations of   production, deals directly with the relationships between classes of   people (the aristocracy, the middle-class and the working class).2       Marxism includes a predictive analysis of socio-economic   structures. Using history, logic and the dynamic nature of humankind as   guidelines, Carl Marx attempts to map out a sequence of events which   will eventually lead to utopia (anarchy). In his work, Das Capital,   Marx details the six steps. These steps are primitive socialism,   feudalism, capitalism, socialism, communism and then anarchy.       The evolution of the English economic system during the 16th and   17th centuries points to a shift from feudalism to capitalism. This   shift is exemplified by the enclosures. The landlords began to fence   their property in the common land areas. The "commons" were large plots   of grazing and farmable lands that were used by both farmers and   artisans. When the land-owners and manorial lords began to partition   these lands the concept of private ownership of property was introduced   to the socio-economic system.3      During the time period of the 16th and 17th centuries the   crown's economic base began a gradual decline. This economic shrinkage   came to a spearhead during the reign of Charles I. The monarchy favored   a monopoly market system over a competitive one. The purpose for this    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.